CATALOGO UNIPAPEL 2012 PDF

Year: ; Month: March; Country: UK; Customer: Unipapel; Resolution: PDF; Media: Unipapel catalogue. Download. Unipapel ID page. Unipapel media storage pockets page. Year: ; Month: March; Country: UK; Customer: Unipapel; Resolution: PDF; Media: Unipapel catalogue; European ranking , sales Mio € (1) Data corresponding to Full year for Unipapel Group and Fiscal year April April General catalogue.

Author: Mikatilar Vimi
Country: Iran
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Art
Published (Last): 8 December 2010
Pages: 327
PDF File Size: 7.57 Mb
ePub File Size: 4.50 Mb
ISBN: 416-7-63063-647-5
Downloads: 80703
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Groshakar

Maquetación editorial de Sapos y Princesas Especial 20 Escapadas

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunal administratif — Interpretation of Article 49 TFEU — Freedom of establishment — Tax legislation — Capital tax — National legislation making the grant of a reduction in capital tax conditional upon remaining liable to that tax in the Member State concerned for the next five tax years — Situation where a company is no longer liable for capital tax following the transfer of its seat to another Member State.

Rouam, acting as AgentsKingdom of the Netherlands represented by: Dismissed the appeal Pleas in law: The order under appeal is clearly defective on account of a total failure to state reasons, unreasonableness, illogicality and distortion of the facts.

The Commission raises a single plea in law in support of its action, alleging infringement of the Treaty and, in particular, of the system of attribution of the regulatory powers which the European Union legislature may attribute to unipaprl Commission pursuant to Article and TFEU.

Adil v Minister voor Immigratie, Integratie en Asiel. Upheld the opposition for all the contested goods and services Decision of the Board of Appeal: Rejected the opposition Decision of the Board of Actalogo Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. Robinson, acting as Agents.

Owsiany-Hornung, acting as Agents Defendant: Appeal brought on 22 August by Fruit of the Loom, Inc. Orders Heijmans NV to pay the costs.

  LIBRO NO LE LLAMES MAS RHONDA FINDLING PDF

Orders Tuzzi fashion GmbH to pay the costs. Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Fermo Italy lodged on 29 August — Criminal proceedings against M. State aid – Undertaking with subsidiaries catalgo certain third countries – Reduced rate loans – Decision declaring aid incompatible in part with the internal market and ordering it to be repaid – Decision taken following ctalogo annulment by the General Court of the initial decision concerning the same procedure – Force of res judicata – Duty to state reasons.

Maquetación editorial de Sapos y Princesas Especial 20 Escapadas | Domestika

Fachin, and subsequently O. The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal Mark or sign cited in opposition: In the alternative, in the event that the Court were to consider that this application for partial annulment is not admissible, — Annul that regulation in its entirety; — Maintain the effects of the abovementioned regulation and of all acts adopted on the basis thereof until the entry into force, within a reasonable period, of a new regulation intended to replace it; — Order the defendants to pay the costs.

European Parliament, Council of the European Union. Skip to main content.

The other parties to the proceedings before the Board unlpapel Appeal Mark or sign cited in opposition: Rejected the opposition in its entirety Decision of the Board of Appeal: English The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

Maquetación editorial de Sapos y Princesas

Other party to the proceedings: Order OHIM to bear the costs of the proceedings; and. Manhaeve, acting as Agents. First plea in law, alleging that the contested act is unlawful for manifest errors of appraisal.

  LYSGAARD 1955 PDF

Pleas in law and main arguments The appellant puts forward three pleas in law in support of its appeal. Right of petition – Petition addressed to the European Parliament – Decision to take no further action – Action for annulment – Duty to state reasons – Petition not falling within an area of activity of the European Union.

Having regard to the nature of the attribution of powers made to the Commission but also to the purpose of the act to be adopted under those powers, such an act ought therefore to be adopted in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article TFEU and not the procedures laid down in Article TFEU. The General Court ultimately based its judgment on the finding that the issue of genuine use of the earlier mark was a specific preliminary issue which it was not necessary for the Board of Appeal to examine.

Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen – Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC – Imputability of the unlawful conduct – Fines – Cooperation during the administrative procedure – Significant added value – Equal treatment. Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen – Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC – Burden of proof – Fines – Gravity of the infringement – Imputability of the unlawful conduct – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence.

The applicant Community trade mark concerned: